Applications · 11 min read

YC Application Do's and Don'ts — A Complete List

Short answer

The YC application is short — fewer than 1,000 words of actual responses across all fields. That brevity is intentional and it is also deceptive: short does not mean easy. Every sentence in a YC application either builds or erodes your credibility with a partner who has read thousands of similar applications and has pattern-matched the phrases, framings, and evasions that signal weak thinking.

The 50-Character Description

This page compiles the most important do's and don'ts across every section of the YC application — drawn from patterns across accepted and rejected applications and from what YC partners have stated publicly about what works and what does not.

DO: Name the product and the specific user in plain language.

*"Inventory management for Indian independent pharmacies"*

DON'T: Lead with technology or adjectives.

*"AI-powered intelligent supply chain optimization platform"*

DO: Make it specific enough that a partner immediately understands what you build and for whom.

DON'T: Use words like "modern," "next-generation," "intelligent," "seamless," "end-to-end," or "platform" — these describe nothing specific.

The Problem Field

DO: Describe the problem from the user's perspective with a specific, observable, costly behavior.

*"Independent pharmacy owners in India discover expired stock only when throwing it away. The average pharmacy loses ₹1.8 lakh per year this way."*

DON'T: Open with market statistics from a research report.

*"The global pharmacy management software market is valued at $4.2 billion and growing at 14% CAGR."*

DO: Name a specific user, a specific behavior, and a specific cost.

DON'T: Describe a general industry inefficiency without anchoring it to a real person experiencing it.

DO: Keep the problem description to 2-3 sentences. Brevity signals clarity of thinking.

DON'T: Use three paragraphs to describe a problem that could be stated in one sentence.

The Solution Field

DO: Describe what your product does for its user in the first sentence.

*"We replace the notebook with a WhatsApp-native inventory system — no app, no login, no training required."*

DON'T: Describe your technology architecture before describing the user benefit.

*"Our system uses a webhook-based real-time data pipeline to process inventory events..."*

DO: State the outcome the user experiences, not the features that produce it.

DON'T: List features without connecting them to user value.

DO: Be specific about what is novel. If your solution is genuinely different, say exactly how.

DON'T: Claim to be "different" or "better" without naming the specific dimension of difference.

The Traction Field

DO: Lead with your strongest commercial metric. Exact number, exact date.

*"₹64,400 MRR as of Monday. 23 paying customers. 89% month-2 retention. All organic."*

DON'T: Lead with vanity metrics (signups, downloads, social followers) if you have commercial metrics.

DO: State every number exactly — not "around 20 customers" but "23 customers."

DON'T: Round numbers. Rounding signals you do not know the exact figure.

DO: Include retention data. It is the most important metric after revenue.

DON'T: Cite engagement metrics (DAU, session length) as if they are equivalent to retention metrics.

DO: Explain what drove growth. *"All 23 customers came from WhatsApp group outreach — 8% conversion rate across 47 groups."*

DON'T: State numbers without explaining what produced them.

DO: Acknowledge weak metrics honestly and explain what you are doing about them.

DON'T: Omit metrics that are weak and hope partners do not ask.

The Insight Field

DO: State something non-obvious that you discovered through direct user contact.

*"Every pharmacy software company built for the pharmacist. The actual inventory manager is a family member who has never used a desktop application for work — they live in WhatsApp."*

DON'T: State an insight that is derivable from reading industry reports.

*"The pharmacy software market is underpenetrated in tier 2 cities."*

DO: Connect the insight directly to a specific product decision.

DON'T: State an insight without showing that it changed how you built something.

DO: Make the insight something that requires your specific background or user research to know.

DON'T: State an insight that any smart person could arrive at without talking to users.

The Business Model Field

DO: State who pays, how much, and how you charge.

*"₹2,500/month per pharmacy, charged monthly, auto-renewed via UPI mandate."*

DON'T: Be vague about who the paying customer is.

DO: State your gross margin.

DON'T: Leave the economics section without a unit economics calculation.

DO: State whether you are default alive.

DON'T: Describe a complex revenue model without explaining how it produces profit.

The Competitive Landscape Field

DO: Name specific competitors. At least two.

DON'T: Say you have no competitors. Every product competes with something — at minimum, with the manual process it replaces.

DO: Acknowledge what each competitor does well before explaining why your user is underserved by them.

DON'T: Describe competitors only in negative terms. It reads as either poor research or defensiveness.

DO: Explain your differentiation in terms of the specific user you serve.

*"Marg ERP requires desktop installation — our user has never opened a desktop app for work."*

DON'T: Describe differentiation as features without connecting them to a specific user need.

The Team Field

DO: Connect each founder's background directly to why they are the right person for this problem.

DON'T: List credentials without connecting them to the specific problem.

DO: Name how long you have worked together, not just how long you have known each other.

DON'T: Be vague about cofounder roles and domain ownership.

DO: Describe a previous conflict you resolved well, if you have one.

DON'T: Describe the founding team as having no tension or disagreements — it signals either a very new relationship or avoidance of hard conversations.

The "Why YC" Field

DO: Name a specific operational gap that YC specifically addresses.

*"We need introductions to pharmaceutical supply chain investors in the US and Southeast Asia. YC's portfolio includes 12 companies in this space."*

DON'T: Write "mentorship and network" as your full answer.

DO: Name a specific partner whose expertise is relevant to your company.

DON'T: Describe generic benefits of YC that apply to every startup equally.

The Video Essay

DO: Both founders on camera. Real product demo if you have one.

DON'T: One founder only, with the other mentioned in passing.

DO: Record in a quiet, well-lit environment. Audio quality matters more than video quality.

DON'T: Read from a script. Partners can tell and it signals poor verbal communication skills.

DO: Open with one sentence that describes exactly what you build.

DON'T: Open with backstory, mission statement, or market context. Start with the product.

General Application Don'ts

DON'T use jargon: "leverage synergies," "move the needle," "disrupt," "10x," "democratize," "revolutionize"

DON'T make claims without evidence: "We have strong traction" without a number

DON'T use passive voice: "Users are being served by our platform" vs. "We serve 23 paying users"

DON'T write long sentences: If a sentence exceeds 25 words, split it

DON'T repeat yourself: Say each important thing once, specifically

DON'T describe the vision before establishing the evidence: Vision is earned by traction, not assumed by ambition

DON'T apply with placeholder text or unfinished fields: Every field should be complete and specific

General Application Do's

DO read every field aloud before submitting — awkward phrasing is easier to catch when heard

DO have someone who has never heard of your company read the application cold and tell you what they think you build

DO verify that every number in the application is exactly correct and matches what you can state from memory

DO ensure both cofounders have read the entire application and can speak to every field

DO submit early — YC reviews applications on a rolling basis and early submission is better than last-minute

Keep reading

More on Applications

Go deeper

Want the full data behind this answer?

Our YC database tracks 5,000+ companies, every batch, with application patterns, founder backgrounds, and pivot stories — the raw material we built this answer on.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the most important field in the YC application?
Traction, specifically your retention data. Partners can evaluate an application quickly when the traction field contains specific, exact commercial metrics — MRR, customer count, and retention rate. These three numbers together tell a more complete story about the viability of your company than any other combination of fields. If the traction field is strong and specific, every other field is read in a favorable light. If the traction field is vague or weak, every other field is read more skeptically.
How long should each field be in the YC application?
As short as it takes to be specific and complete — not shorter. Most fields should be 2-5 sentences. The traction field can be slightly longer if you have multiple metrics to describe. The insight field benefits from a single crisp paragraph rather than bullet points. No field in the YC application benefits from being longer than 150 words. The instinct to write more to appear more thorough is wrong — shorter and more specific is always more credible.
Should I use bullet points in the YC application?
Sparingly and only where they genuinely improve clarity — for example, a list of specific metrics or a list of distinct competitors. Avoid bullet points in narrative fields (insight, problem, solution) where connected prose demonstrates clearer thinking. An insight stated in a well-constructed paragraph reads as more thoughtful than the same content bulleted. Traction metrics stated as a short bulleted list can be more scannable than prose. Use judgment, not default formatting.
How many times should I revise my YC application before submitting?
Until every sentence is specific and every claim is evidenced. The number of revisions is less important than the test: read each field and ask "is there any word here that is vague?" Vague words include "strong," "significant," "many," "growing," "innovative," "modern," and all their synonyms. Replace every vague word with a specific fact or remove it. When no vague words remain, the application is ready.
Should I get feedback from YC alumni before submitting?
Yes, if you can access it. YC alumni who have been through the application process recently can identify vague fields, weak framing, and red flags that you cannot see from inside your own application. The best feedback comes from alumni who will be honest rather than encouraging — the goal is to find problems before a partner finds them. One honest critical read from a YC alumni is worth more than ten positive reads from supportive friends.
Is it better to apply early or wait until my traction is stronger?
Apply when your traction is strong enough to make a compelling case — not before. YC reviews applications on a rolling basis and early submission has some advantage, but applying with weak traction before you have the evidence to make a strong case wastes the application cycle and potentially creates a negative impression in YC's database. The optimal timing: apply when you have at least 3 months of consistent commercial traction with improving retention metrics, so the application tells a story of momentum rather than potential.
What happens if I make a factual error in my YC application?
It will surface in the interview when partners quote your application back at you. If you discover an error after submitting, email YC to provide a correction with the accurate number and a brief explanation of why the application contained the incorrect figure. Do not hope the error goes unnoticed — partners read applications closely and will probe discrepancies. An honest correction delivered before the interview is significantly less damaging than an error discovered during one.
Can I apply if I have not yet incorporated?
Yes. YC does not require incorporation before applying. You will need to incorporate before receiving YC's investment if accepted, but the application process does not require a formal legal entity. Note in the application that you are pre-incorporation and have a specific plan for entity formation — this is normal for very early-stage applicants and is not a disadvantage.
How do I handle the application if my company is in a highly regulated industry?
Name the regulation directly, describe your compliance status specifically, and frame the regulatory complexity as a competitive moat rather than a liability. "We are applying for our NBFC license — application submitted October 2024, expected approval Q2 2025. The 18-month approval timeline is why no new entrant has disrupted this market in the last 4 years. We started the process 18 months ago and we are the only company in our specific niche with an application in progress." Regulatory positions that take years to establish are genuine competitive moats. Frame them that way.
Should I mention specific YC partners by name in the application?
Only in the "Why YC?" field, and only when genuinely relevant. If a specific YC partner has deep expertise in your sector or has backed a company with a similar go-to-market motion, naming them and explaining specifically why their expertise is valuable to your company demonstrates research and seriousness. Generic name-dropping without specific rationale reads as flattery rather than substance.
What is the single most common reason strong companies get rejected from YC at the application stage?
Vagueness. A company with genuinely strong traction and a real insight that is described vaguely in the application loses to a company with slightly weaker fundamentals that describes them with precision. "We have strong traction" loses to "₹64,400 MRR, 23 customers, 89% month-2 retention, all organic." The first describes a category; the second describes a reality. Partners fund realities, not categories. Every field of your application should contain specifics that could only be true of your specific company, not generalities that could be true of any company in your space.
How long does it take to write a strong YC application?
Most founders underestimate this significantly. A strong YC application — one where every field is specific, every claim is evidenced, and every sentence has been tested against the question "is this vague?" — typically takes 10-20 hours of focused work spread over multiple sessions. The first draft usually takes 2-3 hours. The revision process — replacing vague language with specific facts, tightening every sentence, and ensuring both cofounders can speak to every field — takes the remaining time. The video adds another 2-4 hours of iteration. Do not write a YC application in one sitting the day before it is due.

An independent resource · Not affiliated with Y Combinator · Last updated 2026-08-04