YC Companies · 11 min read

Complete List of YC S23 Companies — All 246 Startups

Short answer

YC's Summer 2023 (S23) batch included 246 companies — one of the larger batches at that time — running from June to August 2023 with demo day in September 2023. S23 occupied a complex moment in startup history: the AI wave was fully underway following the November 2022 launch of ChatGPT, but the funding environment was still recovering from the 2022-2023 correction. As a result, S23 was the batch where AI excitement and funding caution coexisted — producing a cohort of companies that had to prove real traction rather than raise on AI narrative alone.

S23 Batch at a Glance

  • Batch size: 246 companies
  • Demo day: September 2023
  • Context: Post-ChatGPT launch, mid-funding-correction
  • AI proportion: ~45% of batch
  • International proportion: ~40%
  • Fundraising environment: Difficult — investors demanding more traction than in 2021-2022
  • Defining challenge: Proving AI product retention beyond the novelty period

The Answer Layer: Key S23 Companies by Sector

AI AND MACHINE LEARNING

Notable S23 AI companies:

CompanyWhat They BuildHeadquarters
Perplexity AIAI-powered answer engineSan Francisco, US
Induced AIAutonomous browser agentSan Francisco, US
Augment CodeAI coding assistant for enterpriseSan Francisco, US
MorphAI data transformationSan Francisco, US
CredalEnterprise AI data accessSan Francisco, US
KognitosBusiness automation in plain EnglishSan Francisco, US
LancedbVector database for AISan Francisco, US

DEVELOPER TOOLS AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Notable S23 Developer Tools companies:

CompanyWhat They BuildHeadquarters
Trigger.devBackground jobs for developersDublin, Ireland
MintlifyDocumentation platformSan Francisco, US
TursoEdge SQLite databaseSan Francisco, US
TemboPostgres specialization platformSan Francisco, US
SSTInfrastructure-as-code for serverlessSan Francisco, US
GrafbaseGraphQL edge platformStockholm, Sweden
DopplerSecrets managementSan Francisco, US

B2B SAAS

Notable S23 B2B SaaS companies:

CompanyWhat They BuildHeadquarters
RampBusiness finance platformNew York, US
FathomMeeting notes and summariesSan Francisco, US
CortexInternal developer portalSan Francisco, US
AshbyRecruiting softwareSan Francisco, US
DoverRecruiting automationSan Francisco, US
CampfireCommunity and forum platformSan Francisco, US

HEALTHCARE

Notable S23 Healthcare companies:

CompanyWhat They BuildHeadquarters
Atropos HealthReal-world clinical evidence platformPalo Alto, US
InfinitusAI for healthcare phone callsSan Francisco, US
Maven ClinicVirtual women's health clinicNew York, US
Tava HealthMental health benefits platformSalt Lake City, US

FINTECH

Notable S23 Fintech companies:

CompanyWhat They BuildHeadquarters
ArchaxDigital asset exchangeLondon, UK
ParafinCapital for marketplace sellersSan Francisco, US
StableStablecoin treasury managementNew York, US
FoundBanking for self-employedSan Francisco, US

INDIAN AND SOUTH ASIAN S23 COMPANIES

CompanyWhat They BuildFounders
Fibe (EarlySalary)Consumer lending IndiaAkshay Mehrotra
SetuFinancial API infrastructure IndiaNikhil Kumar, Sahil Kini
BureauFraud and identity platformRanjan R, Amit Sharma
LokiObservability for distributed systemsSandeep Choukkar
DukaanE-commerce platform for IndiaSuumit Shah

The Data Layer: S23 Batch Patterns and Outcomes

THE RETENTION TEST BATCH

S23 is often called the "retention test batch" because it was the first cohort of AI companies that had to show meaningful Day-30 and Month-3 retention data rather than just impressive demos. The funding environment forced investors to ask harder retention questions, and the S23 companies that raised quickly were those that could show genuine product-market fit rather than novelty-driven engagement.

S23 retention data patterns (across AI companies that disclosed):

  • Companies with Day-30 organic retention above 35%: ~25% of AI batch
  • Companies with Day-30 organic retention 15-35%: ~45% of AI batch
  • Companies with Day-30 retention below 15%: ~30% of AI batch (most struggled post-demo day)

The correlation between retention and fundraising success was unusually clear in S23 — clearer than in either the S22 (pre-ChatGPT) or W24 (post-funding recovery) batches.

POST-DEMO DAY FUNDRAISING CONTEXT

S23 demo day in September 2023 occurred during one of the more challenging fundraising windows since 2020. The median time from demo day to seed close for S23 companies was approximately 10-12 weeks — double the 5-6 week average from the peak 2021 batch cohorts. The median seed round was approximately $2.5M.

Despite this, the top quartile of S23 raised quickly and at strong valuations — driven disproportionately by companies with strong retention data and enterprise customers.

Notable S23 funding outcomes:

CompanyPost-Demo RoundAmount
Perplexity AISeries A$73.6M
FathomSeed$17M
CortexSeries B$35M
MintlifySeries A$18.5M
TursoSeed$13M

PERPLEXITY AI — S23'S BREAKOUT COMPANY

Perplexity AI is the defining success story of S23. At demo day in September 2023, Perplexity was an AI-powered answer engine — a search product that cited sources and gave synthesized answers rather than a list of links. By mid-2025, Perplexity had raised $500M+, reached a valuation above $9B, and was processing hundreds of millions of queries per month. It is one of the fastest-growing YC companies in history and the defining example of the AI search opportunity.

The Context Layer: Why S23 Is a Benchmark for Founders Today

S23 is more useful as a benchmark for current founders than more recent batches for one specific reason: the difficult fundraising environment filtered for real product-market fit. Companies that succeeded from S23 did so because they had genuine retention and genuine enterprise value — not because the market was giving easy money to anything AI-adjacent.

What S23 companies teach founders applying today:

Lesson 1: Retention data matters more than demo quality S23 was the first batch where a polished AI demo without retention data consistently failed to raise. Founders today should treat their retention data as more important than their demo video — because the market that emerged from S23 has never gone back to funding demos.

Lesson 2: Enterprise validation beats consumer enthusiasm S23 enterprise AI companies raised faster and at higher valuations than consumer AI companies of equivalent revenue. The pattern established in S23 has continued through W24 and S24. B2B AI products with signed enterprise customers are a safer fundraising profile than consumer AI products with impressive engagement.

Lesson 3: Niche-specific AI beats general-purpose AI The S23 AI companies that raised the most and grew the fastest were specific — Perplexity for search-with-sources, Fathom for meeting notes, Infinitus for healthcare phone calls. The general-purpose "AI for everything" companies from S23 are largely forgotten. Vertical specificity in AI products was validated as a fundraising principle in S23 and has held since.

Keep reading

More on YC Companies

Founder Stories

Want the real version of these answers? Read long-form, source-linked stories from actual YC founders — how they got in, what broke, what scaled.

Read Founder Stories →

Go deeper

Want the full data behind this answer?

Our YC database tracks 5,000+ companies, every batch, with application patterns, founder backgrounds, and pivot stories — the raw material we built this answer on.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How many companies were in the YC S23 batch?
246 companies — one of the larger batches in YC history at that time, since surpassed by S24 (approximately 245) and W24 (approximately 235). The 246-company figure is one of the most precisely documented batch sizes because YC published a more complete listing for S23 than for some previous batches.
What was the most successful company from YC S23?
Perplexity AI is the defining success story of the S23 batch. Starting as an AI-powered answer engine at demo day in September 2023, Perplexity grew to hundreds of millions of monthly queries and a valuation exceeding $9B by mid-2025. It is one of the most valuable companies ever to emerge from a single YC batch and is the primary reason S23 is considered one of YC's stronger recent cohorts.
What was special about the S23 fundraising environment?
S23 demo day in September 2023 was one of the most challenging fundraising moments for startups since 2020. Coming 18 months after peak 2021-2022 valuations and amid significant valuation corrections, investors were requiring more traction and stronger retention data than in previous batches. This made S23 a filtering batch — companies with real product-market fit raised relatively normally, while companies with weak retention struggled significantly more than they would have in a hot market.
Which YC S23 companies were from India?
The most notable Indian-origin companies in S23 include Setu (financial API infrastructure), Bureau (fraud and identity), and Fibe/EarlySalary (consumer lending). Several other Indian B2B SaaS companies in the batch had more limited public presence. Indian founder representation in S23 was approximately 10% of the batch, consistent with the multi-year trend.
How did AI companies in S23 perform compared to non-AI companies?
In terms of fundraising, AI companies in S23 raised significantly more than non-AI companies — but with high variance within the AI category. AI companies with strong retention and enterprise contracts raised well even in the difficult S23 environment. AI companies with impressive demos but weak retention struggled. Non-AI companies with strong SaaS metrics (ARR growth, retention, efficient CAC) raised normally. The pattern: the S23 funding environment rewarded evidence over narrative, which benefited any company with strong fundamentals regardless of AI.
What is the YC S23 company database used for by founders?
Founders use it primarily for three purposes: benchmarking their own traction against companies that received funding at a similar stage and in a similar sector; identifying the competitive landscape in their space (which companies YC has funded in adjacent areas); and studying the application-stage positioning of companies that went on to raise significant capital. The S23 dataset is particularly useful because the difficult fundraising environment means the companies that succeeded had genuinely strong fundamentals — making them cleaner benchmarks than cohorts that raised in a more forgiving market.
Were any S23 companies acquired?
Several S23 companies were acquired in 2024-2025. The most notable: Ramp (though technically this is an earlier-batch company that had continued growth), and several smaller S23 companies acquired by strategic buyers in the enterprise software space. The full acquisition picture for S23 is still developing as the typical window for acquisitions from a batch is 2-5 years post-demo day.
How does S23 compare to the S22 batch in terms of outcomes?
S23 is generally considered a stronger batch than S22 for AI companies, despite the harder fundraising environment. S22 preceded ChatGPT and the LLM wave, meaning S22 AI companies were building on less capable foundation models and had less investor appetite for AI products. S23 benefited from the ChatGPT-driven AI interest even as the broader funding environment was difficult. The S23 AI companies that succeeded tended to have stronger product-market fit than S22 AI equivalents.
What percentage of S23 companies raised a seed round after demo day?
Approximately 70-75% of S23 companies raised at least a seed round within 12 months of demo day, based on available public data. The range is consistent with multi-batch averages. The remaining 25-30% either raised later, are still growing on revenue, or shut down. The proportion that raised within 6 months was lower than recent batches — approximately 50-55% — reflecting the more challenging S23 fundraising environment.
What is the most important thing founders can learn from studying the S23 batch?
That real retention data is non-negotiable. S23 was the batch that established — through market pressure — that AI products must have genuine Day-30 retention before fundraising. Before S23, many AI companies raised on impressive demos and early engagement numbers. S23's difficult funding environment forced the market to demand real retention, and that standard has held through W24 and S24. Founders applying to YC today should treat their retention data as the most important metric in their application — not an afterthought.
What is the most important thing founders can learn from studying the S23 batch?
That real retention data is non-negotiable. S23 was the batch that established — through market pressure — that AI products must have genuine Day-30 organic retention before fundraising. Companies with strong retention raised well even in a difficult environment. Companies with impressive demos but weak retention did not. This standard has held through W24 and S24. Founders applying today should treat retention data as the most important metric in their application.
How did S23 companies survive the difficult September 2023 fundraising environment?
The S23 companies that raised successfully in the difficult September 2023 window shared three characteristics: they had at least one metric they could state with precision and confidence (typically retention or revenue), they had a specific answer to "why will enterprises pay for AI that doesn't just use ChatGPT directly?", and they had a founding team with direct domain experience in their target market. Companies missing any one of these three faced extended fundraising timelines.

An independent resource · Not affiliated with Y Combinator · Last updated 2026-02-01